United States v. Bennington

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4565 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00255-DMG-1 v. MEMORANDUM* CARL DE VERA BENNINGTON, AKA Carl Bennington, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 22, 2025** Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Carl de Vera Bennington appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a time-served sentence and six months’ supervised release. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).  Bennington’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. AFFIRMED. 2 24-4565