FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8825021
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Ash Sheep Co.

No. 8825021 · Decided December 2, 1918
No. 8825021 · Ninth Circuit · 1918 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 2, 1918
Citation
No. 8825021
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
HUNT, Circuit Judge. By writ of error the Ash Sheep Company seeks a reversal of a judgment entered against it for $5,000 in favor of the United States in an action brought in the district of Montana by the United States to recover the penalties provided by section 2117, Rev. St. (Comp. St. 1916, § 4107). The origin of the case and its history are given in. the opinion we expressed in United States v. Ash Sheep Co., 250 Fed. 592 , — C. C. A.-. It is therefore only now necessary to recite that, after we reversed the judgment of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings, there was a trial to the District Court upon an agreed statement of facts, whereby it was admitted that in July, 1913, the Sheep Company, without the consent of the Crow Tribe of Indians, or of the United States, drove, ranged, and fed 5,000 head of sheep on the lands specified in the complaint; that at that time the land in question had no settlements or entries thereon under the laws of the United States, which provided for settlement and entry being made upon the land; and that in the civil suit brought by the United States to enjoin the Sheep Company from trespassing on the land, the suit being that referred to in the answer of the Sheep Company filed in this action (Ash Sheep Co. v. United States, 250 Fed. 591 , *60 — C. C. A.-), the United States sought to recover as damages the penalties it i's herein seeking to recover. The foregoing statement and the assignments of error disclose that the present case raises -the same questions, and only those, which were directly involved in, and were considered and decided by this court upon, the former writ of error; and counsel for the Sheep Company state in their brief that the writ of error herein is prosecuted for the .purpose of saving the right to seek a review of our former opinion by the Supreme Court. As no reason occurs to us for reversing the views we announced in our earlier opinion, we abide by it, and affirm the judgment of the District Court. Affirmed.
Plain English Summary
By writ of error the Ash Sheep Company seeks a reversal of a judgment entered against it for $5,000 in favor of the United States in an action brought in the district of Montana by the United States to recover the penalties provided by sect
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
By writ of error the Ash Sheep Company seeks a reversal of a judgment entered against it for $5,000 in favor of the United States in an action brought in the district of Montana by the United States to recover the penalties provided by sect
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Ash Sheep Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 2, 1918.
Use the citation No. 8825021 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →