FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 4536854
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Arrez Meliton-Salto

No. 4536854 · Decided September 20, 2018
No. 4536854 · Ninth Circuit · 2018 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 20, 2018
Citation
No. 4536854
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50038 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00523-BEN v. MEMORANDUM* ARREZ MELITON-SALTO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 12, 2018** Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Arrez Meliton-Salto appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the sentence imposed following his bench-trial conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Meliton-Salto challenges the three-year term of supervised release imposed by the district court. He contends that the court procedurally erred by failing to consider U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c), calculate the Guidelines range for supervised release, and adequately explain the sentence. Because Meliton-Salto did not raise these objections in the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir. 2008). There was no plain error. The district court explained that it believed that a term of supervised release was necessary in light of its concerns about deterrence and protection of the public. The court followed the applicable Guideline, see U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1 cmt. n.5, and adequately explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, Meliton- Salto has not shown a reasonable probability that he would have received a different sentence had the court explicitly calculated the Guidelines range for supervised release. See Dallman, 533 F.3d at 762. AFFIRMED. 2 18-50038
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2018 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2018 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Arrez Meliton-Salto in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 20, 2018.
Use the citation No. 4536854 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →