Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688176
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Armenta-Alcantar
No. 8688176 · Decided July 31, 2008
No. 8688176·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2008
Citation
No. 8688176
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*470 MEMORANDUM ** Jose Armenta-Alcantar appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Armenta-Alcantar • contends that the government’s refusal to move for an additional one level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b) is arbitrary and amounts to vindictive prosecution. The government’s stated reason for not filing the motion was Armenta-Alcantar’s refusal to plead pursuant to a fast-track plea agreement. The government’s decision is not based on an unconstitutional motive, nor does it amount to arbitrary government action. See United States v. Espinoza-Cano, 456 F.3d 1126, 1138 (9th Cir.2006) (finding nothing improper about the government providing an incentive to plea bargain). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*470 MEMORANDUM ** Jose Armenta-Alcantar appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01*470 MEMORANDUM ** Jose Armenta-Alcantar appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
02Armenta-Alcantar • contends that the government’s refusal to move for an additional one level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G.
03§ 3El.l(b) is arbitrary and amounts to vindictive prosecution.
04The government’s stated reason for not filing the motion was Armenta-Alcantar’s refusal to plead pursuant to a fast-track plea agreement.
Frequently Asked Questions
*470 MEMORANDUM ** Jose Armenta-Alcantar appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Armenta-Alcantar in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688176 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.