FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10596586
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Alvarado

No. 10596586 · Decided June 2, 2025
No. 10596586 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 2, 2025
Citation
No. 10596586
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6180 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:13-cr-00026-SPW-2 v. MEMORANDUM* THOMAS ALVARADO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 21, 2025** Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Thomas Alvarado appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his fifth motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the district court stated, it denied Alvarado’s four previous compassionate release motions because “while Alvarado has shown extraordinary and compelling reasons for sentence reduction under USSG §1B1.13 due to his serious health issues, such a reduction is not warranted under the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.” In the instant motion, Alvarado claimed that his medical conditions were worsening, and the Bureau of Prisons was not providing him appropriate care. The district court ordered and reviewed Alvarado’s medical records and concluded they did not support Alvarado’s claims. It therefore denied compassionate release again. Contrary to Alvarado’s contentions, the record supports the district court’s conclusions regarding the care he is receiving in prison, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record). AFFIRMED. 2 24-6180
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Alvarado in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 2, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10596586 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →