Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10596586
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Alvarado
No. 10596586 · Decided June 2, 2025
No. 10596586·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 2, 2025
Citation
No. 10596586
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6180
D.C. No.
Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:13-cr-00026-SPW-2
v.
MEMORANDUM*
THOMAS ALVARADO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Thomas Alvarado appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
fifth motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United
States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
As the district court stated, it denied Alvarado’s four previous
compassionate release motions because “while Alvarado has shown extraordinary
and compelling reasons for sentence reduction under USSG §1B1.13 due to his
serious health issues, such a reduction is not warranted under the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) factors.” In the instant motion, Alvarado claimed that his medical
conditions were worsening, and the Bureau of Prisons was not providing him
appropriate care. The district court ordered and reviewed Alvarado’s medical
records and concluded they did not support Alvarado’s claims. It therefore denied
compassionate release again.
Contrary to Alvarado’s contentions, the record supports the district court’s
conclusions regarding the care he is receiving in prison, and the court did not abuse
its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206,
1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is
illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record).
AFFIRMED.
2 24-6180
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No.
03Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 21, 2025** Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
04Thomas Alvarado appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his fifth motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 2 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Alvarado in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 2, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10596586 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.