Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630074
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Akers
No. 8630074 · Decided April 13, 2007
No. 8630074·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 13, 2007
Citation
No. 8630074
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant Scott Akers’ (Akers) request for an evidentiary hearing. An evidentiary hearing was unwarranted because Akers’ motion to suppress failed to “allege facts with sufficient definiteness, clarity, and specificity to enable the trial court to conclude that contested issues of fact exist.” United States v. Howell, 231 *650 F.3d 615, 620 (9th Cir.2000) (citations omitted). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant Scott Akers’ (Akers) request for an evidentiary hearing.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant Scott Akers’ (Akers) request for an evidentiary hearing.
02An evidentiary hearing was unwarranted because Akers’ motion to suppress failed to “allege facts with sufficient definiteness, clarity, and specificity to enable the trial court to conclude that contested issues of fact exist.” United State