FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8911447
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Adams

No. 8911447 · Decided May 12, 1976
No. 8911447 · Ninth Circuit · 1976 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 12, 1976
Citation
No. 8911447
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
OPINION Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case, Judgment reversed.
Plain English Summary
OPINION Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
OPINION Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Adams in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 12, 1976.
Use the citation No. 8911447 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →