Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647236
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Adamic
No. 8647236 · Decided January 22, 2008
No. 8647236·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 22, 2008
Citation
No. 8647236
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Adamic contends that the special condition of probation that prevents him from possessing or using a computer with any “on-line computer service” was not contemplated in his plea agreement and that the condition is excessive and unreasonable. Because this court previously concluded that Adamic’s challenge to his conditions of supervised release was foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver, Adamic’s contention is precluded under the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Scrivner, 189 F.3d 825, 827-28 (9th Cir.1999). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release.
02Adamic contends that the special condition of probation that prevents him from possessing or using a computer with any “on-line computer service” was not contemplated in his plea agreement and that the condition is excessive and unreasonabl
03Because this court previously concluded that Adamic’s challenge to his conditions of supervised release was foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver, Adamic’s contention is precluded under the law of the case doctrine.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Adamic in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 22, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647236 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.