FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 797130
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, and Shell Oil Company

No. 797130 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 797130 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 797130
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, and Shell Oil Company is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America, and Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Shell Oil Company, United States of America Department of Toxic Substances Control, State of California v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, as Successor in Interest to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company Union Pacific Transportation Company, as Successor in Interest to the Southern Pacific Transportation Company, and Shell Oil Company in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 797130 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →