Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Unit Process Company v. Raychem Corporation Creole Engineering Sales Company v. Raychem Corporation Unit Process Company Brock Easley, Inc. Bylin Heating Sust. Fluid Flow Control Contractors, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Raychem Corporation, and Debenham Electrical Supply Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 727809
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Unit Process Company v. Raychem Corporation Creole Engineering Sales Company v. Raychem Corporation Unit Process Company Brock Easley, Inc. Bylin Heating Sust. Fluid Flow Control Contractors, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Raychem Corporation, and Debenham Electrical Supply Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
No. 727809 · Decided September 26, 1996
No. 727809·Ninth Circuit · 1996·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 26, 1996
Citation
No. 727809
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Unit Process Company v. Raychem Corporation Creole Engineering Sales Company v. Raychem Corporation Unit Process Company Brock Easley, Inc. Bylin Heating Sust. Fluid Flow Control Contractors, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Raychem Corporation, and Debenham Electrical Supply Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Unit Process Company v. Raychem Corporation Creole Engineering Sales Company v. Raychem Corporation Unit Process Company Brock Easley, Inc. Bylin Heating Sust. Fluid Flow Control Contractors, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Raychem Corporation, and Debenham Electrical Supply Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 26, 1996.
Use the citation No. 727809 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.