Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10652255
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
True Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation
No. 10652255 · Decided August 12, 2025
No. 10652255·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 12, 2025
Citation
No. 10652255
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, No. 22-15710
INC.; MCLAUGHLIN
CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATES, D.C. No.
INC., individually and as 4:13-cv-02219-
representatives of a class of similarly HSG
situated persons,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER
v.
MCKESSON CORPORATION;
MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, No. 22-15732
INC.,
D.C. No.
Plaintiff, 4:13-cv-02219-
HSG
and
MCLAUGHLIN CHIROPRACTIC
ASSOCIATES, INC., individually and
2 TRUE HEALTH CHIROPACTIC, INC. V. MCKESSON CORP.
as representatives of a class of
similarly situated persons,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MCKESSON CORPORATION;
MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed August 12, 2025
Before: Danny J. Boggs, * Sidney R. Thomas, and Danielle
J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.
Order
COUNSEL
Glenn L. Hara (argued), Anderson & Wanca, Rolling
Meadows, Illinois; Willem Jonckheer, Dustin Schubert, and
Robert C. Schubert, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, San
Francisco, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-
Appellant.
*
The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, INC. V. MCKESSON CORP. 3
Joseph R. Palmore (argued) and Adam L. Sorensen,
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Tiffany
Cheung, Zach Z. Tan, and Bonnie Lau, Morrison & Foerster
LLP, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-
Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
ORDER
Appellees’ Motion for Supplemental Briefing (Dkt. 62)
is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to the district court
for further proceedings consistent with the United States
Supreme Court’s opinion in McLaughlin Chiropractic
Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp., 606 U.S. --, 145 S. Ct.
2006 (2025).
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, No.
Key Points
01FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRUE HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC, No.
02INC., individually and as 4:13-cv-02219- representatives of a class of similarly HSG situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER v.