FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 460202
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Toraki Matsumoto v. Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees. Toraki Matsumoto v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, and Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, Real Party in Interest, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Real Parties in Interest

No. 460202 · Decided November 12, 1985
No. 460202 · Ninth Circuit · 1985 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 12, 1985
Citation
No. 460202
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Toraki Matsumoto v. Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees. Toraki Matsumoto v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, and Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, Real Party in Interest, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Real Parties in Interest is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Toraki Matsumoto v. Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees. Toraki Matsumoto v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, and Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, Real Party in Interest, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Real Parties in Interest in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 12, 1985.
Use the citation No. 460202 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →