Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8669257
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Tomasello v. North Arkansas Wholesale, Inc.
No. 8669257 · Decided April 21, 2008
No. 8669257·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 21, 2008
Citation
No. 8669257
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s civil action for failure state a claim sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction and failure to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 . The court has received and reviewed appellant’s response to the court’s February 14, 2008 order to show cause and the responses and reply thereto. A review of the record and these responses indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per cu-riam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s civil action for failure state a claim sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction and failure to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s civil action for failure state a claim sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction and failure to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
02The court has received and reviewed appellant’s response to the court’s February 14, 2008 order to show cause and the responses and reply thereto.
03A review of the record and these responses indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s civil action for failure state a claim sufficient to establish federal question jurisdiction and failure to establish diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Tomasello v. North Arkansas Wholesale, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 21, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8669257 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.