Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8670081
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Tica v. Mukasey
No. 8670081 · Decided April 30, 2008
No. 8670081·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2008
Citation
No. 8670081
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Florencia S. Tica, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) exclusion order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition for review and remand. Tica contends that the IJ violated due process by failing to inform her of the availability of relief and by refusing to grant a continuance or administrative closure. Although Tica raised these claims before the BIA, the BIA failed to address them. We therefore remand for further proceedings. See Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.2007) (“When a petitioner raises a claim based on a purported procedural defect of the proceedings before the IJ, the only administrative entity capable of independently addressing that claim is the BIA.”); see also INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 , 123 S.Ct. 353 , 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam). PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Tica, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) exclusion order.
Key Points
01Tica, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) exclusion order.
02Tica contends that the IJ violated due process by failing to inform her of the availability of relief and by refusing to grant a continuance or administrative closure.
03Although Tica raised these claims before the BIA, the BIA failed to address them.
04Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.2007) (“When a petitioner raises a claim based on a purported procedural defect of the proceedings before the IJ, the only administrative entity capable of independently addressing that claim is the BI
Frequently Asked Questions
Tica, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) exclusion order.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Tica v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8670081 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.