Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7218988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Then-Estrella v. Ashcroft
No. 7218988 · Decided March 18, 2002
No. 7218988·Ninth Circuit · 2002·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 18, 2002
Citation
No. 7218988
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** William Then-Estrella, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). The permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply to this case because removal proceedings were initiated against petitioner after April 1, 1997. See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We lack jurisdiction to review petitioner’s request for cancellation of removal. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 281 F.3d 906, 910 (9th Cir.2002). Furthermore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review petitioner’s due process contention. See Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 533 U.S. 348 , 121 S.Ct. 2268, 2269-70 , 150 L.Ed.2d 392 (2001). We deny petitioner’s request to transfer to the district court. PETITION DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** William Then-Estrella, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cance
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** William Then-Estrella, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cance
02The permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 apply to this case because removal proceedings were initiated against petitioner after April 1, 1997.
03We lack jurisdiction to review petitioner’s request for cancellation of removal.
04Furthermore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review petitioner’s due process contention.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** William Then-Estrella, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cance
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Then-Estrella v. Ashcroft in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 18, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7218988 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.