Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8643806
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Taylor v. Salinas Valley State Prison
No. 8643806 · Decided August 21, 2007
No. 8643806·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8643806
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jeffrey Lamont Taylor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his First Amendment rights by denying him access to the law library. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Taylor’s claim that he was denied access to the prison library and thus deprived of a fair trial, because Taylor could not demonstrate any actual injury. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 , 116 S.Ct. 2174 , 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (finding that there is no abstract freestanding right to a law library and that the inmate must demonstrate that his efforts to pursue a legal claim were hindered). Taylor’s remaining contentions are without merit. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jeffrey Lamont Taylor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jeffrey Lamont Taylor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his First Amendment rights by denying him access to the law library.
03We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C.
04The district court properly dismissed Taylor’s claim that he was denied access to the prison library and thus deprived of a fair trial, because Taylor could not demonstrate any actual injury.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jeffrey Lamont Taylor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Taylor v. Salinas Valley State Prison in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 21, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8643806 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.