Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9024987
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Taylor v. Cnty. of Pima
No. 9024987 · Decided August 14, 2019
No. 9024987·Ninth Circuit · 2019·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 14, 2019
Citation
No. 9024987
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Schroeder voted to grant the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Graber voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Siler so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petitions for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Judge Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED .
Plain English Summary
Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing.
Key Points
01Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing.
02Judge Schroeder voted to grant the petitions for panel rehearing.
03Judge Graber voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Siler so recommended.
04Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petitions for rehearing en banc.
Frequently Asked Questions
Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Taylor v. Cnty. of Pima in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 14, 2019.
Use the citation No. 9024987 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.