FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9489276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Tatyana Drevaleva v. Denis McDonough

No. 9489276 · Decided March 29, 2024
No. 9489276 · Ninth Circuit · 2024 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 29, 2024
Citation
No. 9489276
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, No. 23-15308 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-04995-HSG v. MEMORANDUM* DENIS McDONOUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 26, 2024** Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. 2002) (dismissal based on claim preclusion); Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987) (sua sponte dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Drevaleva’s action on the basis of claim preclusion because Drevaleva raised, or could have raised, her claims in her prior federal actions, which involved the same parties or their privies and resulted in final judgments on the merits. See Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical Sys., 430 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting forth elements of claim preclusion under federal law). The motion to file an oversized opening brief (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted. The Clerk will file the opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 12. The motion for an extension of time to serve the opening brief (Docket Entry No. 18) is denied as unnecessary. All other pending motions are denied. AFFIRMED. 2 23-15308
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Tatyana Drevaleva v. Denis McDonough in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 29, 2024.
Use the citation No. 9489276 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →