Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642448
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Tarakhchyan v. Gonzales
No. 8642448 · Decided August 21, 2007
No. 8642448·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 21, 2007
Citation
No. 8642448
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because there were several material inconsistencies between Tarakhehyan’s testimony and her asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B). The IJ’s finding that Tarakhchyan failed to establish her eligibility for asylum is therefore supported by the record. Tarakhchyan is also ineligible for withholding of removal, see Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003), and relief under the Convention Against Torture, see id. at 1157 . Because Tarakhchyan failed to raise the issue below, we lack jurisdiction to review her assertion that faulty translation undermined the administrative record. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1). PETITION DISMISSED in part AND DENIED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because there were several material inconsistencies between Tarakhehyan’s testimony and her asylum application.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because there were several material inconsistencies between Tarakhehyan’s testimony and her asylum application.
02The IJ’s finding that Tarakhchyan failed to establish her eligibility for asylum is therefore supported by the record.
03Tarakhchyan is also ineligible for withholding of removal, see Farah v.
04Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003), and relief under the Convention Against Torture, see id.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because there were several material inconsistencies between Tarakhehyan’s testimony and her asylum application.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Tarakhchyan v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 21, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642448 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.