Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8690747
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Talavera Roman v. Mukasey
No. 8690747 · Decided November 4, 2008
No. 8690747·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 4, 2008
Citation
No. 8690747
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Angel Tízoc Talavera Roman and Flora Castaneda Zarate, married natives and cit *649 izens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s March 17, 2005 order dismissing petitioners’ direct appeal because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir .2003). The petition for review is timely only as to the BIA’s July 22, 2005 order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen. In their opening brief, petitioners’ fail to address and therefore have waived any challenge to this order. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Angel Tízoc Talavera Roman and Flora Castaneda Zarate, married natives and cit *649 izens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Angel Tízoc Talavera Roman and Flora Castaneda Zarate, married natives and cit *649 izens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s March 17, 2005 order dismissing petitioners’ direct appeal because this petition for review is not timely as to that order.
03The petition for review is timely only as to the BIA’s July 22, 2005 order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen.
04In their opening brief, petitioners’ fail to address and therefore have waived any challenge to this order.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Angel Tízoc Talavera Roman and Flora Castaneda Zarate, married natives and cit *649 izens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Talavera Roman v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 4, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8690747 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.