Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10386198
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Szymborski v. State of Nevada
No. 10386198 · Decided April 25, 2025
No. 10386198·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 25, 2025
Citation
No. 10386198
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEE EDWARD SZYMBORSKI, No. 23-2787
D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01164-JAD-VCF
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION;
AARON DARNELL FORD; NEVADA
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
COURTS; NEVADA EIGHTH JUDICIAL
DISTRICT COURT; NEVADA EIGHTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
ADMINISTRATION; Chief Judge LINDA
MARIA BELL; Nevada Supreme Court
Chief Justice JAMES W. HARDESTY;
Nevada Court of Appeals, Chief Judge
MICHAEL P. GIBBONS; COUNTY OF
CLARK; Governor STEVE SISOLAK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2025**
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Lee Edward Szymborski appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and
the Rehabilitation Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6). Lund v. Cowan, 5 F.4th 964, 968 (9th Cir. 2021). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Szymborski’s action because his claims
are barred by judicial immunity. See Duvall v. County of Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124,
1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to whether an act is judicial in
nature and subject to absolute judicial immunity); see also Lund, 5 F.4th at 972
(explaining that “there can be no respondeat superior liability where there is no
underlying wrong by the employee, which includes situations in which the
employee is immune to suit”).
AFFIRMED.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)
2 23-2787
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEE EDWARD SZYMBORSKI, No.
03MEMORANDUM* STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION; AARON DARNELL FORD; NEVADA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS; NEVADA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT; NEVADA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATION; Chief Judge LINDA
04GIBBONS; COUNTY OF CLARK; Governor STEVE SISOLAK, Defendants - Appellees.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Szymborski v. State of Nevada in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 25, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10386198 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.