FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10386198
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Szymborski v. State of Nevada

No. 10386198 · Decided April 25, 2025
No. 10386198 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 25, 2025
Citation
No. 10386198
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEE EDWARD SZYMBORSKI, No. 23-2787 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01164-JAD-VCF Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION; AARON DARNELL FORD; NEVADA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS; NEVADA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT; NEVADA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATION; Chief Judge LINDA MARIA BELL; Nevada Supreme Court Chief Justice JAMES W. HARDESTY; Nevada Court of Appeals, Chief Judge MICHAEL P. GIBBONS; COUNTY OF CLARK; Governor STEVE SISOLAK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 22, 2025** * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges. Lee Edward Szymborski appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Lund v. Cowan, 5 F.4th 964, 968 (9th Cir. 2021). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Szymborski’s action because his claims are barred by judicial immunity. See Duvall v. County of Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124, 1133 (9th Cir. 2001) (describing factors relevant to whether an act is judicial in nature and subject to absolute judicial immunity); see also Lund, 5 F.4th at 972 (explaining that “there can be no respondeat superior liability where there is no underlying wrong by the employee, which includes situations in which the employee is immune to suit”). AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) 2 23-2787
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Szymborski v. State of Nevada in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 25, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10386198 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →