FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 701058
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Stuart H. Hirsh v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm L. Lucas Edward Panelli Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald M. George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General & Acting Personally for His Private Appointee's Financial Gain State Bar of California Ellen R. Peck, Employee of the State Bar as a Claimed Judge David C. Carr, Employee Prosecutor of State Bar Association, Ralph F. Server v. Supreme Court of the State of California State Bar of California, Harold Lenard Perry v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm Lucas, Chief Edward Panelli Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren Lise Perlman, Edmundo B. Espinoza v. Malcolm Lucas, Honorable, Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California Kathryn Mickle Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General

No. 701058 · Decided March 29, 1995
No. 701058 · Ninth Circuit · 1995 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 29, 1995
Citation
No. 701058
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Stuart H. Hirsh v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm L. Lucas Edward Panelli Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald M. George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General & Acting Personally for His Private Appointee's Financial Gain State Bar of California Ellen R. Peck, Employee of the State Bar as a Claimed Judge David C. Carr, Employee Prosecutor of State Bar Association, Ralph F. Server v. Supreme Court of the State of California State Bar of California, Harold Lenard Perry v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm Lucas, Chief Edward Panelli Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren Lise Perlman, Edmundo B. Espinoza v. Malcolm Lucas, Honorable, Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California Kathryn Mickle Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stuart H. Hirsh v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm L. Lucas Edward Panelli Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald M. George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General & Acting Personally for His Private Appointee's Financial Gain State Bar of California Ellen R. Peck, Employee of the State Bar as a Claimed Judge David C. Carr, Employee Prosecutor of State Bar Association, Ralph F. Server v. Supreme Court of the State of California State Bar of California, Harold Lenard Perry v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm Lucas, Chief Edward Panelli Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren Lise Perlman, Edmundo B. Espinoza v. Malcolm Lucas, Honorable, Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California Kathryn Mickle Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 29, 1995.
Use the citation No. 701058 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →