Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8896998
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Stodick v. Cupp
No. 8896998 · Decided September 25, 1970
No. 8896998·Ninth Circuit · 1970·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 25, 1970
Citation
No. 8896998
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: It was not error to deny appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The error in state trial on which appellant relies was admission without objection of testimony by a police officer that in response to an inquiry as to ownership of an automobile appellant had stated: “I’d rather not say.” On this record this was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Judgment affirmed.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: It was not error to deny appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: It was not error to deny appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
02The error in state trial on which appellant relies was admission without objection of testimony by a police officer that in response to an inquiry as to ownership of an automobile appellant had stated: “I’d rather not say.” On this record t
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: It was not error to deny appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stodick v. Cupp in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 25, 1970.
Use the citation No. 8896998 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.