Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641539
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Stinson v. Alameda County
No. 8641539 · Decided June 12, 2007
No. 8641539·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 12, 2007
Citation
No. 8641539
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*535 MEMORANDUM ** To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s April 9, 2007 order directing him to show cause, within 21 days, why summary affirmance of this appeal would not be appropriate. A review of the record and appellant’s brief filed February 28, 2007, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*535 MEMORANDUM ** To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s April 9, 2007 order directing him to show cause, within 21 days, why summary affirmance of this appeal would not be appropriate.
Key Points
01*535 MEMORANDUM ** To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s April 9, 2007 order directing him to show cause, within 21 days, why summary affirmance of this appeal would not be appropriate.
02A review of the record and appellant’s brief filed February 28, 2007, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
*535 MEMORANDUM ** To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s April 9, 2007 order directing him to show cause, within 21 days, why summary affirmance of this appeal would not be appropriate.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stinson v. Alameda County in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 12, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641539 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.