FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8829825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Stephens v. United States

No. 8829825 · Decided February 9, 1920
No. 8829825 · Ninth Circuit · 1920 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 9, 1920
Citation
No. 8829825
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff in error urges that the indictment “does not allege any intent whatsoever.” It is true that it does not use the word “intent,” but the allegation that defendant knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously did attempt to pause and create insubordination and disloyalty in the military and naval forces, by doing the things charged, sufficiently charged that the altempt was done with willful and unlawful purpose. Bise v. United States, 144 Fed. 374 , 74 C. C. A. 1 , 7 Ann. Cas. 165; People v. Butler, 1 Idaho, 231 ; State v. Rechnitz, 20 Mont. 488 , 52 Pac. 264 ; State v. Clark, 32 Nev. 145 , 104 Pac. 593 , Ann. Cas. 1912C, 754; Atkinson v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 424 , 30 S. W. 1064 ; State v. Hagar, 50 W. Va. 370 , 40 S. E. 393 ; Bunch v. State, 58 Fla. 9 , 50 South. 534 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 91 ; State v. Daly, 41 Or. 515 , 70 Pac. 706 ; State v. Hughes, 31 Nev. 270 , 102 Pac. 562 ; People v. Willett, 102 N. Y. 251 , 6 N. E. 301 . Motion denied.
Plain English Summary
Plaintiff in error urges that the indictment “does not allege any intent whatsoever.” It is true that it does not use the word “intent,” but the allegation that defendant knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously did attempt to paus
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Plaintiff in error urges that the indictment “does not allege any intent whatsoever.” It is true that it does not use the word “intent,” but the allegation that defendant knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously did attempt to paus
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stephens v. United States in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 9, 1920.
Use the citation No. 8829825 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →