FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 726339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Stella Kodman, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Matthew Dean Lane Matthew Dean Lane, a Minor v. The County of Merced Merced County Child Protective Services Bernard Martinez Shirley Corbin, Individually and as Agents and Employees of Merced County Child Protective Services John Cullen Melody Archer Hub Walsh, Individually and as the Managing Agents of Merced County Child Protective Services

No. 726339 · Decided August 21, 1996
No. 726339 · Ninth Circuit · 1996 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 21, 1996
Citation
No. 726339
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Stella Kodman, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Matthew Dean Lane Matthew Dean Lane, a Minor v. The County of Merced Merced County Child Protective Services Bernard Martinez Shirley Corbin, Individually and as Agents and Employees of Merced County Child Protective Services John Cullen Melody Archer Hub Walsh, Individually and as the Managing Agents of Merced County Child Protective Services is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stella Kodman, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Matthew Dean Lane Matthew Dean Lane, a Minor v. The County of Merced Merced County Child Protective Services Bernard Martinez Shirley Corbin, Individually and as Agents and Employees of Merced County Child Protective Services John Cullen Melody Archer Hub Walsh, Individually and as the Managing Agents of Merced County Child Protective Services in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 21, 1996.
Use the citation No. 726339 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →