Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Stash v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
No. 8646761 · Decided December 28, 2007
No. 8646761·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 28, 2007
Citation
No. 8646761
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jerome A. Stash, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his civil rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir.1984). We vacate and remand for further proceedings. The district court abused its discretion by dismissing Stash’s action for failure to apprise the court of his current address, where the docket reflects that Stash filed a notice of change of address with the district court prior to the dismissal of this case. Stash filed two additional notices of change of address with the district court after the dismissal. We vacate and remand to give the district court an opportunity to resend the notice of assignment to Stash’s current address. Appellant shall bear his costs on appeal. VACATED AND REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Stash, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01Stash, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his civil rights.
03We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute.
04The district court abused its discretion by dismissing Stash’s action for failure to apprise the court of his current address, where the docket reflects that Stash filed a notice of change of address with the district court prior to the dis
Frequently Asked Questions
Stash, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Stash v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 28, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646761 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.