Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Solorzano v. Gonzales
No. 8623663 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623663·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623663
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alma Rosa Solorzano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Solorzano failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her United States citizen son. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir. 2005). To the extent Solorzano contends the BIA’s summary affirmance procedure violated her right to due process, the contention is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the Board’s affirmance of an IJ’s decision without issuing an opinion does not violate due process). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alma Rosa Solorzano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for c
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alma Rosa Solorzano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for c
02We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Solorzano failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her United States citizen son.
03To the extent Solorzano contends the BIA’s summary affirmance procedure violated her right to due process, the contention is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v.
04Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the Board’s affirmance of an IJ’s decision without issuing an opinion does not violate due process).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alma Rosa Solorzano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for c
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Solorzano v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623663 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.