Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642966
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Solomon v. Western Exterminator Co. (In re Poplin)
No. 8642966 · Decided April 20, 2007
No. 8642966·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8642966
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Barry L. Solomon, appeals directly from the district court order affirming in part, and remanding in part, a bankruptcy court order dismissing his complaint served one business day after the expiration of the time provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 4(m). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), we do not have jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals in bankruptcy cases. Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir.2003). Here, the district court’s order was not final; the Trustee appealed the district court’s order before the bankruptcy court could make the requisite determinations on the remanded issues. See Bonner Mall P’ship v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. (In re Bonner Mall P’ship), 2 F.3d 899, 904 (9th Cir.1993) (citing King v. Stanton (In re Stanton), 766 F.2d 1283, 1286 (9th Cir. 1985)). The appeal is DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Solomon, appeals directly from the district court order affirming in part, and remanding in part, a bankruptcy court order dismissing his complaint served one business day after the expiration of the time provided by Federal Rule of Civil P
Key Points
01Solomon, appeals directly from the district court order affirming in part, and remanding in part, a bankruptcy court order dismissing his complaint served one business day after the expiration of the time provided by Federal Rule of Civil P
02§ 158 (d), we do not have jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals in bankruptcy cases.
03City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir.2003).
04Here, the district court’s order was not final; the Trustee appealed the district court’s order before the bankruptcy court could make the requisite determinations on the remanded issues.
Frequently Asked Questions
Solomon, appeals directly from the district court order affirming in part, and remanding in part, a bankruptcy court order dismissing his complaint served one business day after the expiration of the time provided by Federal Rule of Civil P
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Solomon v. Western Exterminator Co. (In re Poplin) in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642966 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.