FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8508733
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Smith v. McDaniel

No. 8508733 · Decided October 12, 2010
No. 8508733 · Ninth Circuit · 2010 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 12, 2010
Citation
No. 8508733
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER ** Under Thompson v. Frank, 599 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam), we lack appellate jurisdiction to review the *279 district court’s stay-and-abeyance order. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Frank, 599 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam), we lack appellate jurisdiction to review the *279 district court’s stay-and-abeyance order.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Frank, 599 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam), we lack appellate jurisdiction to review the *279 district court’s stay-and-abeyance order.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Smith v. McDaniel in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 12, 2010.
Use the citation No. 8508733 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →