Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625050
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Smith v. Johnson
No. 8625050 · Decided September 25, 2006
No. 8625050·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 25, 2006
Citation
No. 8625050
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s July 18, 2006 *266 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record). To the extent appellant seeks to challenge the order granting partial summary judgment, appellant must do so in a timely appeal from a final judgment of the district court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). All pending motions are denied. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *266 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s July 18, 2006 *266 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive re
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s July 18, 2006 *266 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive re
02Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
03To the extent appellant seeks to challenge the order granting partial summary judgment, appellant must do so in a timely appeal from a final judgment of the district court.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *266 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s July 18, 2006 *266 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive re
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Smith v. Johnson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 25, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625050 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.