Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8693162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Smith v. California
No. 8693162 · Decided November 20, 2014
No. 8693162·Ninth Circuit · 2014·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 20, 2014
Citation
No. 8693162
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** In light of the Defendants’ concession that they were not “prevailing parties]” *651 within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and that the award of costs should be reversed, we reverse the award of costs. REVERSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** In light of the Defendants’ concession that they were not “prevailing parties]” *651 within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and that the award of costs should be reversed, we reverse the award of costs.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** In light of the Defendants’ concession that they were not “prevailing parties]” *651 within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and that the award of costs should be reversed, we reverse the award of costs.
02This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** In light of the Defendants’ concession that they were not “prevailing parties]” *651 within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) and that the award of costs should be reversed, we reverse the award of costs.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Smith v. California in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 20, 2014.
Use the citation No. 8693162 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.