FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8674969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Singh v. Mukasey

No. 8674969 · Decided May 22, 2008
No. 8674969 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 22, 2008
Citation
No. 8674969
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Narinder Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration’s (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order denying asylum. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the determination that Singh’s asylum application was untimely because that determination turns on a disputed question of fact. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). We lack jurisdiction to consider Singh’s contentions regarding changed circumstances, extraordinary circumstances, and alleged due process violations by the IJ because Singh failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Narinder Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration’s (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order denying asylum.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Narinder Pal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration’s (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order denying asylum.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 22, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8674969 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →