Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646152
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Singh v. Mukasey
No. 8646152 · Decided December 3, 2007
No. 8646152·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 3, 2007
Citation
No. 8646152
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based on changed circumstances arising in India. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen in light of his previous material misrepresentations to the Department of Homeland Security, formerly the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and his unexplained delay in filing his motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based
02Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen in light of his previous material misrepresentations to the Department of Homeland Security, formerly the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and his unexplained d
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Sukhwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 3, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646152 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.