Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Singh v. Gonzales
No. 8630682 · Decided April 27, 2007
No. 8630682·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8630682
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Harjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review. The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Singh’s motion to reopen because it was filed approximately two years after the BIA’s final exclusion order, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final administrative removal order), and Singh failed to present new and material evidence of changed conditions in India, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii) (no time limit on motion to reopen to apply for asylum based on changed country conditions). We do not consider Singh’s contentions regarding the agency’s order denying asylum, which we upheld in Singh v. Ashcroft, 109 Fed.Appx. 880 (9th Cir.2004). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Harjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Harjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings.
02INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Singh’s motion to reopen because it was filed approximately two years after the BIA’s final exclusion order, see 8 U.S.C.
04§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of final administrative removal order), and Singh failed to present new and material evidence of changed conditions in India, see 8 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Harjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630682 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.