FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Singh v. Gonzales

No. 8629667 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 8629667 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8629667
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The court has received and reviewed the parties’ responses to the court’s December 1, 2006 order. The questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also El Rescate legal Services, Inc. v. EOIR, 959 F.2d 742 , 752 (9th Cir.1992). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The court has received and reviewed the parties’ responses to the court’s December 1, 2006 order.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The court has received and reviewed the parties’ responses to the court’s December 1, 2006 order.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629667 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →