FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629056
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Singh v. Gonzales

No. 8629056 · Decided February 27, 2007
No. 8629056 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8629056
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*577 MEMORANDUM ** Kulwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. In his motion to reopen, Singh sought a new order of voluntary departure after failing to depart within his original voluntary departure period. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of the motion to reopen. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir.2004) (order) (noting that this court lacks “jurisdiction to review the decision by the BIA to grant or deny a request for voluntary departure”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*577 MEMORANDUM ** Kulwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen remova
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
*577 MEMORANDUM ** Kulwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen remova
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629056 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →