FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629053
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Singh v. Gonzales

No. 8629053 · Decided February 27, 2007
No. 8629053 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8629053
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Nake Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his second motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s second motion to reopen as numerically barred under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (permitting only one motion to reopen deportation proceedings to be filed within ninety days of the administrative decision). Singh’s reliance on Fajardo v. INS, 300 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.2002) is misplaced because Fajardo holds that the single-motion limitation does not apply to in absentia orders of deportation, and Singh’s deportation order was not entered in absentia. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Nake Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his second motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Nake Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his second motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629053 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →