Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621471
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Singh v. Gonzales
No. 8621471 · Decided May 15, 2006
No. 8621471·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 15, 2006
Citation
No. 8621471
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Hardev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review. Singh’s opening brief does not contain any argument regarding the IJ’s findings that he lacked credibility, that he failed to establish a nexus between his support for the Shiromani Akali Dal Mann and his arrest, and that he did not have a well-founded fear of future persecution. Accordingly, he has waived any challenge to the IJ’s grounds for denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Singh also fails to address, and therefore waives, his claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture. See id. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Hardev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholdin
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Hardev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholdin
02Singh’s opening brief does not contain any argument regarding the IJ’s findings that he lacked credibility, that he failed to establish a nexus between his support for the Shiromani Akali Dal Mann and his arrest, and that he did not have a
03Accordingly, he has waived any challenge to the IJ’s grounds for denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal.
04INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Hardev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum and withholdin
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 15, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621471 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.