Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626865
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Shunzi Qian v. Gonzales
No. 8626865 · Decided December 8, 2006
No. 8626865·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 8, 2006
Citation
No. 8626865
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Shunzi Qian, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We lack jurisdiction to review Qian’s contentions regarding the grounds for the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Qian, who was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings, failed to raise them before the agency. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1); Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004). The agency denied asylum and withholding of removal based on the unchallenged credibility finding, and Qian does not challenge the agency’s denial of relief under the CAT. We therefore dismiss the petition for review. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Shunzi Qian, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her applications for
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Shunzi Qian, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her applications for
02We lack jurisdiction to review Qian’s contentions regarding the grounds for the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Qian, who was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings, failed to raise them before the agency.
03The agency denied asylum and withholding of removal based on the unchallenged credibility finding, and Qian does not challenge the agency’s denial of relief under the CAT.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Shunzi Qian, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her applications for
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Shunzi Qian v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 8, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626865 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.