Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629703
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Shaver v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
No. 8629703 · Decided March 20, 2007
No. 8629703·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 20, 2007
Citation
No. 8629703
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Shaver (“Shaver”), a commodities futures broker, appeals from a final order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 , 21(i)(4) (2000). The CFTC summarily affirmed and adopted a decision by the National Futures Association (“NFA”), which stated that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communications in violation of NFA Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(1). The NFA’s decision that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communica *618 tions in violation of Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(l) is supported by the weight of the evidence. Morris v. CFTC, 980 F.2d 1289,1292 (9th Cir.1992). Similarly, the NFA’s decision to sanction Shaver with a $2,000 fíne and a 2-year tape recording requirement was not an abuse of discretion. Premex, Inc. v. CFTC, 785 F.2d 1403, 1408 (9th Cir.1986). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Shaver (“Shaver”), a commodities futures broker, appeals from a final order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”).
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Michael Shaver (“Shaver”), a commodities futures broker, appeals from a final order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”).
02The CFTC summarily affirmed and adopted a decision by the National Futures Association (“NFA”), which stated that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communications in violation of NFA Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(1).
03The NFA’s decision that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communica *618 tions in violation of Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(l) is supported by the weight of the evidence.
04Similarly, the NFA’s decision to sanction Shaver with a $2,000 fíne and a 2-year tape recording requirement was not an abuse of discretion.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Michael Shaver (“Shaver”), a commodities futures broker, appeals from a final order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”).
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Shaver v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 20, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629703 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.