Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625046
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Shadian v. Union Bank
No. 8625046 · Decided September 25, 2006
No. 8625046·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 25, 2006
Citation
No. 8625046
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the response to the court’s May 9, 2006 order to show cause, appellant’s filings and the answering brief, and we conclude the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. To the extent appellant seeks a writ of mandamus, appellant has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir.1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the response to the court’s May 9, 2006 order to show cause, appellant’s filings and the answering brief, and we conclude the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argu
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the response to the court’s May 9, 2006 order to show cause, appellant’s filings and the answering brief, and we conclude the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argu
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
04To the extent appellant seeks a writ of mandamus, appellant has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the response to the court’s May 9, 2006 order to show cause, appellant’s filings and the answering brief, and we conclude the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argu
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Shadian v. Union Bank in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 25, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625046 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.