FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10372934
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)

No. 10372934 · Decided April 4, 2025
No. 10372934 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 4, 2025
Citation
No. 10372934
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, No. 24-488 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01942-GMN-MDC v. MEMORANDUM* FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), Defendant - Appellee, and NEWREZ, LLC, doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 31, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HAWKINS, FISHER, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.*** SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) appeals an adverse partial judgment dismissing some but not all of its claims. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we dismiss the appeal. After suffering an adverse partial judgment, SFR voluntarily dismissed its remaining claim without prejudice. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Unless otherwise stated, [a voluntary] dismissal is ordinarily without prejudice . . . .”). “[W]hen a party that has suffered an adverse partial judgment subsequently dismisses any remaining claims without prejudice, and does so without the approval and meaningful participation of the district court, this court lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” Galaza v. Wolf, 954 F.3d 1267, 1272 (9th Cir. 2020). The district court did not approve of or meaningfully participate in SFR’s voluntary dismissal. It was “never asked to, and did not, enter a separate judgment.” Id. at 1269–70. Thus, there was no “final judgment” to make “appealable an order that otherwise would have been non-final.” Id. at 1271. We accordingly lack jurisdiction over this appeal. DISMISSED. *** The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 24-488
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 4, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10372934 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →