Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10372934
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
No. 10372934 · Decided April 4, 2025
No. 10372934·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 4, 2025
Citation
No. 10372934
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, No. 24-488
D.C. No.
Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01942-GMN-MDC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE),
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NEWREZ, LLC, doing business as
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 31, 2025**
Phoenix, Arizona
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: HAWKINS, FISHER, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.***
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) appeals an adverse partial judgment
dismissing some but not all of its claims. Because we lack appellate jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we dismiss the appeal.
After suffering an adverse partial judgment, SFR voluntarily dismissed its
remaining claim without prejudice. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506
(9th Cir. 1995) (“Unless otherwise stated, [a voluntary] dismissal is ordinarily
without prejudice . . . .”). “[W]hen a party that has suffered an adverse partial
judgment subsequently dismisses any remaining claims without prejudice, and
does so without the approval and meaningful participation of the district court, this
court lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” Galaza v. Wolf, 954 F.3d 1267,
1272 (9th Cir. 2020). The district court did not approve of or meaningfully
participate in SFR’s voluntary dismissal. It was “never asked to, and did not, enter
a separate judgment.” Id. at 1269–70. Thus, there was no “final judgment” to
make “appealable an order that otherwise would have been non-final.” Id. at 1271.
We accordingly lack jurisdiction over this appeal.
DISMISSED.
***
The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the
Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit, sitting by designation.
2 24-488
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, No.
03MEMORANDUM* FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), Defendant - Appellee, and NEWREZ, LLC, doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Defendant.
04Navarro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 31, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2025 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sfr Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 4, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10372934 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.