Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630847
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Setyawan v. Gonzales
No. 8630847 · Decided April 30, 2007
No. 8630847·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2007
Citation
No. 8630847
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alefka Yosua Samuel Setyawan seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s order denying Setyawan’s application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003), and Setyawan does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alefka Yosua Samuel Setyawan seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s order denying Setyawan’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alefka Yosua Samuel Setyawan seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s order denying Setyawan’s application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v.
03Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003), and Setyawan does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v.
04Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alefka Yosua Samuel Setyawan seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s order denying Setyawan’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Setyawan v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630847 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.