Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641523
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Schlund v. Bush
No. 8641523 · Decided June 11, 2007
No. 8641523·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8641523
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Charles August Schlund III appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging, inter alia, a wide-ranging conspiracy involving “implants used for torture and/or surveillance.” We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . After de novo review, Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004), we affirm. The district court properly granted President Bush’s motion to dismiss the claims against him because Schlund’s allegations that Bush deprived him of his constitutional rights were conelusory and based on unreasonable inferences. See id.; see also Simmons v. Sacramento County Sup.Ct., 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir.2003) (conelusory allegations of conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of due process insufficient to state a claim). Schlund’s remaining contentions also lack merit. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Charles August Schlund III appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging, inter alia, a wide-ranging conspiracy involving “implants used for torture and/or surveillance.” We have jurisdiction u
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Charles August Schlund III appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging, inter alia, a wide-ranging conspiracy involving “implants used for torture and/or surveillance.” We have jurisdiction u
02The district court properly granted President Bush’s motion to dismiss the claims against him because Schlund’s allegations that Bush deprived him of his constitutional rights were conelusory and based on unreasonable inferences.
03Sacramento County Sup.Ct., 318 F.3d 1156, 1161 (9th Cir.2003) (conelusory allegations of conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of due process insufficient to state a claim).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Charles August Schlund III appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action alleging, inter alia, a wide-ranging conspiracy involving “implants used for torture and/or surveillance.” We have jurisdiction u
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Schlund v. Bush in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641523 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.