Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/Sandy Snyder, Administrator of the Estate of David Haas, and Bill Brooke Robert Sandoval and Robert Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Freight, Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local No. 287 Ed Quintal Ed De Brock George Netto and Lee Scoggins, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 763624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sandy Snyder, Administrator of the Estate of David Haas, and Bill Brooke Robert Sandoval and Robert Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Freight, Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local No. 287 Ed Quintal Ed De Brock George Netto and Lee Scoggins, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
No. 763624 · Decided June 3, 1999
No. 763624·Ninth Circuit · 1999·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 3, 1999
Citation
No. 763624
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Sandy Snyder, Administrator of the Estate of David Haas, and Bill Brooke Robert Sandoval and Robert Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Freight, Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local No. 287 Ed Quintal Ed De Brock George Netto and Lee Scoggins, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sandy Snyder, Administrator of the Estate of David Haas, and Bill Brooke Robert Sandoval and Robert Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Freight, Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local No. 287 Ed Quintal Ed De Brock George Netto and Lee Scoggins, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 3, 1999.
Use the citation No. 763624 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.