Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621475
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Salisbury v. Kandilian
No. 8621475 · Decided May 17, 2006
No. 8621475·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 17, 2006
Citation
No. 8621475
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Duke Salisbury, Chapter 11 Trustee of Compton Enterprises, Inc., appeals the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing his adversary proceeding against Rouben Kandilian with prejudice. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the *634 district court’s Amended Order Affirming Order of Bankruptcy Court, entered July 26, 2004. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Duke Salisbury, Chapter 11 Trustee of Compton Enterprises, Inc., appeals the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing his adversary proceeding against Rouben Kandilian with prejudice.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * Duke Salisbury, Chapter 11 Trustee of Compton Enterprises, Inc., appeals the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing his adversary proceeding against Rouben Kandilian with prejudice.
02§ 158 (d), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the *634 district court’s Amended Order Affirming Order of Bankruptcy Court, entered July 26, 2004.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Duke Salisbury, Chapter 11 Trustee of Compton Enterprises, Inc., appeals the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing his adversary proceeding against Rouben Kandilian with prejudice.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Salisbury v. Kandilian in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 17, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621475 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.