Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7164747
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Royal Foods Co. v. L.R. Holdings, Inc.
No. 7164747 · Decided June 11, 2001
No. 7164747·Ninth Circuit · 2001·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 11, 2001
Citation
No. 7164747
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from a district court ruling in which the court reversed the final judgment of the bankruptcy court and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court for further factual findings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) (2000). Because of the nature of the remand and the centrality of the legal issue presented, we have discretion to exercise jurisdiction in these circumstances. See Bonner Mall v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage, 2 F.3d 899, 903-04 ; In re Stanton, 766 F.2d 1283, 1286-88 , 1288 n. 8 (9th Cir.1985). For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed today in Royal Foods Co. v. RJR Holdings Inc., No. 99-55634, which involves the identical legal issue raised in *501 this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. TROTT, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
TROTT, Circuit Judge. For the reasons expressed in my dissent in Royal Foods v. RJR Holdings, 252 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir.2001) (TROTT, Circuit Judge, Dissenting) I respectfully dissent here also.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from a district court ruling in which the court reversed the final judgment of the bankruptcy court and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court for further factual findings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from a district court ruling in which the court reversed the final judgment of the bankruptcy court and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court for further factual findings.
02Because of the nature of the remand and the centrality of the legal issue presented, we have discretion to exercise jurisdiction in these circumstances.
03Bancorp Mortgage, 2 F.3d 899, 903-04 ; In re Stanton, 766 F.2d 1283, 1286-88 , 1288 n.
04For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed today in Royal Foods Co.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from a district court ruling in which the court reversed the final judgment of the bankruptcy court and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court for further factual findings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Royal Foods Co. v. L.R. Holdings, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 11, 2001.
Use the citation No. 7164747 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.