FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10734194
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

No. 10734194 · Decided November 10, 2025
No. 10734194 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 10, 2025
Citation
No. 10734194
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED NOV 10 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL Agency Nos. SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-483 SALVADOR-ROJAS, A246-606-482 A246-606-484 Petitioners, A246-606-485 v. ORDER PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. BEFORE: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator A judge of this Court has sua sponte requested a vote on whether the Order issued by the three judge panel on October 24, 2025 and this case should be reheard en banc pursuant to General Order 5.4.c.3. To facilitate the en banc process, the three judge panel has consented to stay the Order issued on October 24, 2025. Therefore, the October 24, 2025 Order issued by the three judge panel is stayed pending the conclusion of en banc proceedings and further order of this Court. The parties are permitted, but not required, to file simultaneous supplemental briefs addressing whether this case should be reheard en banc. The briefs shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order and shall not exceed 14,000 words. At the direction of the panel, the pending motion to submit the case on the briefs is denied, but the oral argument scheduled for December 2, 2025 is vacated pending en banc proceedings and will be rescheduled by a subsequent order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION FILED NOV 10 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION FILED NOV 10 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 10, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10734194 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →