Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rodriguez v. Mukasey
No. 8647780 · Decided February 19, 2008
No. 8647780·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 19, 2008
Citation
No. 8647780
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * To the extent that petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals decision to affirm the denial of cancellation of removal due to a failure to establish an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D), we lack jurisdiction. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). To the extent that petitioners argue that they have a parental right to raise their U.S. citizen children in the United States, cf. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 , 120 S.Ct. 2054 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000), they have failed to make a colorable constitutional claim. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R.36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * To the extent that petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals decision to affirm the denial of cancellation of removal due to a failure to establish an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” 8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * To the extent that petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals decision to affirm the denial of cancellation of removal due to a failure to establish an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” 8 U.S.C.
02To the extent that petitioners argue that they have a parental right to raise their U.S.
032054 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000), they have failed to make a colorable constitutional claim.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * To the extent that petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals decision to affirm the denial of cancellation of removal due to a failure to establish an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” 8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rodriguez v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 19, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8647780 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.